Skip to main content

Open science

Persistent identifiers, scholarly interoperability, citation metadata, reproducibility readiness, and preservation for my public research outputs.

Persistent identity

This site uses persistent scholarly identifiers only when they have been verified. It does not generate placeholder DOIs, ROR IDs, or archive records.

Identifier coverage

Formal scholarly outputs with a DOI: 2 / 2. Across all ORCID-profile outputs mirrored by the site, 3 / 5 currently carry a DOI.

DOI coverage is reported as observed metadata, not as a quality score. Conference contributions and works without an assigned DOI remain valid scholarly outputs.

Repository readiness

The table below is generated from public repository metadata. The readiness level is an internal reproducibility diagnostic; it is not a claim of scientific quality.

Repository Role Level Citation License CI Release Archive DOI
qselmer/pel-climate-adaptive-management-paper Project 1 - MIT Yes - -
qselmer/pelagicPER-availability-risk-paper Project 1 - - No - -
qselmer/humboldt-ocean-watch Software 1 - MIT No - -
qselmer/oceancube Software 3 CFF MIT Yes v0.2.0 -
qselmer/.template-training Teaching 1 CFF + ORCID - Yes - -
qselmer/git-github-training Teaching 1 - - Yes - -

Reproducibility scale

  • Level 0 - Repository: Public repository exists.
  • Level 1 - Documented: Repository has usable documentation.
  • Level 2 - Reproducible inputs: Documentation plus explicit license, citation metadata, and computational environment or tests.
  • Level 3 - Automated: Level 2 plus continuous integration or an equivalent automated validation workflow.
  • Level 4 - Archived release: Level 3 plus a versioned release and archival persistent identifier.
  • Level 5 - Research object: Level 4 plus a bounded, machine-readable research object with provenance.

Preservation and interoperability

The preservation target is a versioned public release linked to persistent identifiers when those identifiers actually exist. Software citation uses CITATION.cff; CodeMeta is tracked as an interoperability target; archival DOI and RO-Crate are promoted only for stable, bounded research objects.

Machine-readable interfaces:

Provenance. Identity and affiliation identifiers are curated; publication identifiers come from the canonical academic profile; repository readiness comes only from approved public repositories. Missing metadata is reported as missing rather than inferred.